Fat and Sassy

my views on being larger than life.

oh how i have been betrayed March 13, 2010

Filed under: Uncategorized — erylin @ 4:03 pm
Tags: , , , , ,

If you didn’t know already I love food porn shows.  Anthony Bordain is my favorite…i love his almost beat-poetry narrative, his rock and roll sensibility, his willingness to try any food, be it high-end or drunken street vendors, his leather jacket and hair that reminds me of my father. And, until today, his show is free of fatty fatty 2 x 4 narritive…he partakes in whole pigs and bitter beer with wild abandon, greasy fingers and all.  

Until today.   One of his guests on his current show is about food bloggers…and one of the bloggers was scared into giving up is heart, his soul, his livelyhood….they forced him onto a diet because of a heart attack and cholesterol problem.   So while Anthony Bordain….fucking rock and roll king who MADE it….has his own food network show and everything is there, giving an interview to you about your favorite burger….and he has to eat a fucking greek salad and apologize and give the good-fatty-imma-loose-weight docta! ™  spiel.   DAMMIT.    this is food netowork…im supposued to be (relatively) free of this fat hate (especially with tivo to filter out diet commercials), this constant bombardment.   If I wanted to watch diet food I wouldnt tune into to Bordain….he’s sheer food porn…But i guess I don’t get to enjoy my food porn without a fatty disclaimer anymore.

After the commercial break he goes onto say HIS doctor has made him go on a diet too.   HIM.   Bordain is not what i would call obese.   I guess, in a way Bordain proves what HAES proponents have been saying all along.   You CAN be skinny and unhealthy.   Bordain is by no means obese….hes motorcycle/rocker cool, whipcord and lean….but he proves that eating fried pork skin and sausages with beer and smokes for a living is hard on the old ticker, the plumbing system in the body. 

Interestingly all the direct to the audience narrative that usually goes on is his shows is there….as he butchers a whole pig on camera….A little heavy-handed with the symbolism, no?

I feel betrayed.   One more not so safe place.  I know I shouldnt, I feel the saving grace of Bordain admitting even he with his unhealthy love of all things pork is UNhealthy though skinny.  But the food porn has been marred with OMG EAT BETTER YOU ARE GONNA DIEEEEEEEE.    I guess it’s better the fatty fatty 2×4 gonna drop dead on the kitchen floor media hype of the OMGZ OBESITY EPIDEMPIC.

 

Starve the fat babies part 2 March 11, 2010

Filed under: childhood obesity — erylin @ 10:41 am
Tags: ,

More craziness in the world of childhood obesity.    A study by University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill researchers found that obese children as young as 3 years old have elevated levels of C-reactive protein, a marker of inflammation that in adults is considered an early warning sign for possible future heart disease.  Great….lets get junior on statin meds.    The study also found elevated levels of the ratio of ferritin/transferrin saturation (F/T) and the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) — in obese children. Elevated F/T levels started at age 6 and elevated ANC levels were found starting at age 9.

the study was huge too….the study was published online March 1 by the journal Pediatrics. Skinner and fellow Department of Pediatrics researchers Eliana Perrin, M.D., M.P.H., Michael Steiner, M.D. and Frederick Henderson, M.D. arrived at these findings after analyzing data collected as part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2006.

Their analysis included data from 16,335 children ages 1-17 years, who were grouped into four categories based on their body mass index (BMI): healthy weight, overweight, obese and very obese. Under this scheme, a 3.5-year-old who is 39 inches tall and weighs 34 pounds would be in the healthy weight category while a child of the same age and height weighing 43 pounds would be considered very obese. In the group of children analyzed, nearly 70 percent were healthy weight, 15 percent were overweight, 11 percent were obese and 3.5 percent were very obese.

More and more, i think the data is showing the genetic heritability of obeisty….it is all well and good to blame fat people for their weight and health….but 3 year olds?   6 year olds?  Are their parents REALLY feeding them buckets of lard, or so weak willed they let them eat boxes of cookies?  come on get real.  The article goes on to talk about early intervention…..what are we gonna do make 3 year olds run on a treadmill and not eat meat?   /headdesk

 

Well said and it bears repeating March 9, 2010

Filed under: Uncategorized — erylin @ 11:22 pm
Tags: ,

from http://nudemuse.org/2010/03/few-words-for-non-fat-people.html

Even if you are family it is still inappropriate to hassle someone about their body. That means if you really care for someone badgering or belittling them is not okay. If you couch your harassment in pseudo-caring terms you are harming that person.

Let me repeat that so we get it.

If you are insulting, back hand complimenting, belittling, making fun of, poking fun at, even doing that passive aggressive not coming out and saying it thing, playing concerned for the persons health in a way that is little more than shame wrapped up in bullshit, you are hurting that person.

Ask any person who was a fat teenager with Moms especially who engaged in this kind of behavior, if you ask them honestly they were hurt. Some hurt so badly that their self esteem never recovers.

If you think you are acting out of love and you are only causing harm even if the person you are harming never says anything you think about it. If the person you are talking to this way tends to cower, if they get angry if they seem to just kind of start disappearing you need to know that you are responsible for that.

If you really care for and love your fat family member or loved one, you will not participate in their shaming. You will learn to support that person and help them build the self esteem so they want to care for themselves. You will not judge them because their body isn’t the body you want. You will celebrate that person when they come out with high self esteem and a good sense of self.

That is part of your role.

And if you cannot bring yourself to do that for whatever reason at least have the decency to leave the person alone about their body.

 

A study i can get behind. February 25, 2010

Filed under: Uncategorized — erylin @ 12:07 am
Tags: , ,

researchers at UI chicago’s Institute for health research and policy is getting a 2.2 million dollar federal grant to determine if TV advertising affects kids diet, physical activity and weight.   It is a four-year project funded by the National Cancer Institute, and is unique because it will be the first to separate out the effects of tv advertising versus the effects of amount of tv watched. 

Previous research conducted by Powell and her colleagues showed that 98 percent of food-product ads viewed by children ages 2 to 11, and 89 percent of those viewed by adolescents ages 12 to 17, were for foods high in fat, sugar or sodium.

The current study is the first to combine food, beverage and restaurant ad ratings and nutritional data with individual data on obesity to analyze the relationship between product exposure, nutritional content of ad exposure, and food consumption, diet quality and obesity, according to the researchers.

The study will also examine the relationship between exposure to health promotion ads — those that encourage eating fruits and vegetables or getting regular physical activity — and individual behaviors related to diet, activity and weight outcomes.

By measuring the types of ads that children of different ages and races are exposed to, the researchers hope to be able to determine if advertising practices and television viewing patterns contribute to differences in diet and obesity among white and black children.

In previous posts (see https://erylin.wordpress.com/2010/02/09/childhood-obesity-its-not-the-tv-its-the-junk-food-commericals/)   i discussed a study that showed a definite link between COMMERICAL tv and weight issues when compared to dvds, movies ect.   This study will focus on the same thing…perhaps we are looking at a future ban on sugar cereal commericals….however will they sell us HFCS for breakfast then?  I mean of COURSE ads affect what our kids want…and what mother, in a fit of stfu HASNT caved and bought sugar smacks…or dove…or freaking fruit gummies, which passes for real fruit in my kids lunches at school sometimes.   Have you watched Nickelodeon recently?  If they aren’t being sold toys, they are being sold candy….cereal….or strawberry milk…..ick.  

Another factor that really excites me:  this is a GOOD study…it will involve thousands of subjects…..and University of Illinois at Chicago is a RENOWN research facility….we are talking impeccable research here people.  UIC ranks among the nation’s leading research universities and is Chicago’s largest university with 26,000 students, 12,000 faculty and staff, 15 colleges and the state’s major public medical center.  I look forward to seeing the results. 

(from University of Illinois at Chicago)

 

No Brownies at Bake Sales, but Doritos May Be O.K. February 24, 2010

Filed under: Uncategorized — erylin @ 1:24 pm
Tags: ,

from http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/23/no-brownies-at-bake-sales-but-doritos-may-be-o-k/ an article at NYT:

What.  THE FUCK:  “Nine months after effectively banning most fund-raising food sales in city schools, a city panel will vote Wednesday on an amended regulation that will allow student groups to sell items like Pop-Tarts and Doritos during the school day, but not brownies, zucchini bread or anything else homemade.”  and the reason:  NOT because of fears with needles in food when i was a kid (remember having to x ray your trick or treat goodies?) but because homemade goodies are too fattening.   According to the school board “Under the new rules, students may sell fresh fruits and vegetables, or one of 27 specific packaged items that have been approved for sales in city vending machines, between the start of school and 6 p.m. on weekdays. The same goes for parent groups, except for an exception carved out for one no-brownies-barred Parent Teacher Association bake sale during the school day per month.”  I’m down with fruits and veggies, sell those all you want…but do you really think kids will chose an apple over Doritos?  and i know there were guidelines for choosing the “approved foods”: For example, all products must be in marked, single-serving packages with a maximum calorie count of 200. Artificial sweeteners, like Splenda, are banned. Less than 35 percent of the item’s total calories may come from either total sugars or fat. Grain-based products must contain at least 2 grams of fiber. 

 “No homemade or unpackaged items are on the list of “approved” foods because “it’s impossible to know what the content is, or what the portion size is,” said Kathleen Grimm, the deputy chancellor for infrastructure and portfolio planning, who oversees the regulation.”

yea it’s really impossible to know what the content of a given baked good is…unless the person baking  it followed a goddamn recipe stupid.   see, 3 cups of flour has x number of calories.   mix that with egg (y number of calories) and sugar (z number)  then add the numbers together and divide but the number of cookies you made…ta da you know how many calories are in a homemade cookie.  Oh, but its not from a big food company……its not “prepackaged”.   Somehow 20 chemicals are good for you, but banana bread with 4 ingredients is banned because it doenst fit regulations.  

And the kicker…..for student fundraising group, bake sales were a great money maker….you can take 5 dollars worth of ingredients and turn them into cookies, brownies or bread and each serving costs under 25 cents.    Now, the clubs have to go buy the “approved foods”  from sam’s club or costo and mark up….who wants to bet they are making WAY less money, and not selling as much to boot?  

To purchase food for approved sales, students may go to Costco or other stores to buy items for resale, said Eric Goldstein, the schools’ chief executive for food and busing.

The city’s new vending operator, The Answer Group, will also negotiate with vendors to produce fund-raising kits for students, probably by next September, said the group’s president, Tom Murn.

That also didn’t seem to excite students. “With the packaged goods, half the profits are going to the companies,” said Anya Lehr, a senior at LaGuardia High School for the Arts

Shame on you NYC school districts…once again you tried to do something “for our health and the health of our kids”   and instead ended up just supporting big agra business and food manufacturers, all the while taking money out of students hands.   Is it really gonna make teenagers fat if they buy hommade baked goods?  or wont the pop tarts, cookies chips and doritios that are approved do that for you?

 

Children’s Fitness Can Be Improved By Physical Activity Programs In Schools

Filed under: Uncategorized — erylin @ 11:29 am
Tags: ,

um duh!  I just wish they wouldn’t couch it in OMG HELP THE FATTIES terms.    When I was in school, I remember having 2 recesses a day, each was about 40 min long….AND gym 3 x a week…now kids get to go out 1x to recess, and for some kids, that gets taken away as a punishment, so there is no movement at all,  all day  long…they have gym 1 day a week.  just one.   I am ALLL for gym 5x a week…and recess 2x a day…but lets not blame it on the fatties shall we?  we have kids getting served hamburgers and fries as a lunch option EVERY DAY at some schools….ketchup was made a vegetable for schools (under Bush I belive, and I do belive it is now OFF the veggie list but still)   OF COURSE our kids are fatter…they lost 1/2 or more of their play time per day.   THe kids that are better at storing energy (ie the Fat ones) will just start storing it….    and I see something of a vicious cycle too…if fatties are “stupid” and do bad at school (like oh so much of the world wants to portray us)…then they lose their recess…..thereby LOSING the only time they have to go outside and run around and play (my kids teachers regularly takes recess away as a punishment) ……  /headdesk

oh but wait…i am a fat activist…im supposed to be AGAINST exercise in school right?  no im against exercise in school that shames fat kids and makes them feel awful….im against exercise for ONLY the fatties….give ALL our kids a chance at running around outside and playing more, not just the kids who can afford to go to active lessions after school.

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/180132.php

 

biggest loser unsafe says experts February 21, 2010

Filed under: Uncategorized — erylin @ 5:22 pm
Tags: , ,

 

Any of you familiar with me and my blog know my love of reality tv…and my utter hatred of the biggest loser and any other weight loss competition style show.   (see https://erylin.wordpress.com/2010/01/22/i-hate-jillian-michaels/ )  THis post over at yahoo ( i know not the best of sources, but they DID talk to professors form UT at Huston.   I’ll just quote extensively, no snark or explain really is required…someitimes it’s great to be validated by “experts.”

ON the dangers of the show

“They’re taking people who have been inactive and are not in good shape and boom, automatically subjecting them to this stress,” Carol Wolin-Riklin, the bariatric nutrition coordinator for the University of Texas Medical School at Houston, told LiveScience. “Things are going to happen.”

And indeed, things have. Two patients were hospitalized after collapsing during a one-mile (1.6 km) foot race for the season 8 premiere. This year’s season 9 opened with another strenuous challenge in which contestants raced 26.2 miles (42 km) on stationary bikes. Show medical consultant and UCLA professor Rob Huizenga had to drag one protesting contestant off her bike when she was stricken with severe cramps. A second contestant, 526-pound Michael Ventrella, was treated for exhaustion.

 ON the reality of losing weight that fast

For one thing, contestants start out in worse shape than most. Seventeen of the 22 contestants have a body mass index (BMI) over 40, meaning they are severely obese. In the “real world,” more than one-third of U.S. adults, or 72 million people, are considered obese with a BMI of 30 or higher, according to the CDC. But research published last month in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that the number of Americans with a BMI over 40 is just under 6 percent. In other words, the show’s claim that the contestants are the “epitome” of American Obeisty is a bit like saying that VH1’s “Rock of Love with Bret Michaels” epitomizes the American dating scene.

And then there’s the exercise program. Contestants work out five to six hours a day, eating strictly supervised diets. They routinely drop double-digit pounds each week. The contestant who loses the smallest percentage of body weight can be sent home.

In reality, said physician Robert Kushner, the clinical director of the Northwestern University Comprehensive Center on Obesity, a safe rate of weight loss is about one to two pounds per week.

“I think a lot of people can feel quite defeated that they’re losing weight in what we would call a recommended amount, but they would have been voted off the show immediately,” Kushner told LiveScience. “So the message, to me, is just all wrong.”

So is the science. Losing weight rapidly can be risky, according to Virginia Tech professor of human nutrition, foods and exercise Janet Walberg Rankin. Patients who lose weight quickly run the risk of gallstones, mineral deficiencies, loss of muscle tissue and reduced bone density.

ON regaining the weight

Risks aside, weight-loss experts say that the biggest problem with the Biggest Loser is that extreme methods of dropping pounds are less likely to work in the long run. Several former Biggest Loser contestants have regained some or all of the weight, which doesn’t surprise Kushner.

“They’re not working with a trainer every day, they’re not on national TV every day, they’re back to life,” he said. “It’s very difficult to sustain.”

While researchers aren’t sure if repeated cycles of weight lost and weight gained are more dangerous than staying overweight or obese, the psychological toll of failing to keep weight off can be grim, said Kushner. People often feel like failures and become hopeless about their health.

all quotes are from http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20100221/sc_livescience/thebiggestloserhasbigproblemshealthexpertssay by Stephanie Pappas LiveScience Contributor